Business & Tech, Development, Housing, Real Estate

Co-Housing Trend Hits Seattle

By Jane Hodges, Thursday, March 18, 2010 at 5:01 PM
View Comments

Cohousing – “intentional” living communities where residents occupy their own houses or condo units but otherwise share everything from potlucks to P-Patch duty with neighbors—is resurfacing in metro Seattle for the first time in more than a decade. Currently, two new developments are seeking members in advance of ground-breaking on Capitol Hill and in Newcastle on the eastside.

In addition, there’s more cohousing on the market than normal: West Seattle’s Duwamish Cohousing is offering up a rarely-available two-bedroom loft for $250,000. South of Seattle, newly-launched Woodard Lane Cohousing in Olympia is selling a handful of homes priced from the high $275,000 to about $430,000.

Architect's rendering of Trails at Newcastle
Architect’s rendering of Trails at Newcastle

So what’s the story with cohousing? Cohousing communities are multi-family developments that cultivate and expect community participation from residents. Unlike buying a condo or new construction in a development, where “community” means little more than homeowners’ association  meetings to talk maintenance spending, buying into a cohousing community takes the idea of sharing resources much further: Cohousing sites typically encourage shared cooking and meals in a community dining room, shared participation in property upkeep, shared gardening and community service, birthday celebrations, and more neighborliness than your average building or city block.

Nancy Carroll, the Lake & Company agent representing the Duwamish Cohousing listing, says anyone buying into a cohousing community should attend its potlucks and social events to make sure they feel a cultural fit. While other members don’t “vote” on who buys into their community (i.e., this isn’t a New York co-op board), it is important that home buyers get a sense of what they’re joining. (Duwamish Cohousing’s site lists an interview with community members and reading “On Conflict and Consensus,” a decision-making process document, among steps to making a purchase there.)

With more cohousing properties in the offing in multiple cities, the Bothell-based Cohousing Association of the United States is running bus tours in San Francisco, Portland, and Seattle to school potential co-habitants or would-be cohousing group developers on what the lifestyle involves and how different communities operate.

“Living among strangers is not the cohousing model,” says Craig Ragland, the association’s spokesperson, who is swift to note that cohousing sites are not “communes.” Ragland says it’s not just for the middle-aged, either, noting that a group of 20-somethings have formed Ravenna Kibbutz as a cohousing community with a focus around Judaism.

Getting in on the ground floor of a cohousing community may mean having a hand in deciding what community elements it boasts.  Both The Trails at Newcastle and the as-yet unnamed Capitol Hill cohousing project are still finalizing details of their plans before they break ground, in part because they’re still recruiting new members.

Grace Kim, an architect and owner of Schemata Workshop who is leading the charge to launch a new cohousing community on Capitol Hill, is slowly recruiting members to occupy her twelve-to fourteen-unit site near Cal Anderson Park. The goal is for a 2012 move-in date, she says, but she’s still pitching the idea to prospective residents at potlucks and information sessions and told PubliCola she didn’t have pricing estimates yet.

Kim says the land for the project has been purchased and Schemata will work with partners to develop it. Unlike other cohousing communities, this one will feature relatively-small units ranging in size from 550 square feet to 950 square feet. Kim is picturing a community patio, kitchen and dining area, guest room, and an extensive rooftop garden that would provide residents with year-round food production and possibly enough produce that the community can sell it to local restaurants.

“We’re still in the early stages,” she says. “But it’s exciting because it’s been at least ten years since a new cohousing community has opened in Seattle.”

The Trails at Newcastle, an estimated $17 million development to be built on a six-acre patch abutting a green belt and trail system that runs east to Cougar Mountain, plans to break ground this summer on 32 homes. Eight homes—five conventional, three designated affordable—are already claimed, but the community continues to seek new members, according to Ben Kaufman, a community founder and project partner who plans to become one of the anchor tenants along with his wife. Prices are reasonable: $400,000 to $600,000 for four-star Built Green homes with 1,300 to 2,100 square feet and solar-ready design, meaning a buyer can easily upgrade to a solar heating system post move-in. Johnston Architects did the designs.

Kaufman says details of the community’s features are still emerging, but current plans include a sustainable water-conserving “rain garden” on the property, a shared tool shed, shared bike shed, and landscaped paths linked to a nearby trail system. In addition, Kaufman foresees a large community center building with a kitchen, guest room, and a multi-purpose room for yoga or conferences, topped with studios for self-employed types or artists. He’s angling for a Zipcar spot to spur car-sharing.

Get schooled on cohousing:

April 18: Cohousing general information session and meet-and-greet regarding forthcoming Capitol Hill project, First United Methodist Church, 180 Denny Way, 12:30 p.m. -2:30 p.m.

March, April and May gatherings: Trails at Newcastle is holding frequent meet-and-greet events

May 15: Seattle Cohousing Bus Tour, $95 for the day

  • Brynnen
    There is also Jackson Place Cohousing in Seattle, opened 8 years ago, south of Capitol Hill and just east of downtown, near Rainier Avs S and S Dearborn St. We're at www.seattlecohousing.org. We may have a unit up for sale in the next little while.
  • Thanks Jane, and to all the commenters. I sit on the Planning Commission for Normandy Park where we have a cottage housing ordinance. No developer has brought a proposal yet, but we are listening.

    In the meantime the Newcastle community shows great design and ethical stature. As a realtor, my clients will here more about Trails and the other cooperative projects that meet the sustainable test.
    I welcome your comments.
  • gracehkim
    There are lots of apartment and condo projects that have cohousing-like layouts. The difference with cohousing is the intention for community. Agreed that Millenials are more community oriented - but we're hoping for a multigenerational group on Cap Hill. If you are interested in learning more I would really encourage you to attend the info session I am hosting on April 18. You can RSVP (free) and get more info on the event by going to http://cohousing0310.eventbrite.com/
  • joshuadf
    I've seen the small units with more shared space design in non-cohousing workforce apartments like the proposals at John/Terry and 8th/Westlake.

    Patrick Kennedy also argues that Millenials are more community oriented in general: http://www.carfreeinbigd.com/2008/09/generation...
    I'm slightly too old to be a Millenials, but generations are fuzzy anyway.
  • gracehkim
    Many built (and forming) cohousing communities desire income diversity. The realities of construction financing, complexities of income certification for federal funding, and a host of other logistic issues often are the reason that those with lower incomes have found themselves priced out of Cohousing. However, Section 8 vouchers and Community Land Trust mortgages can help lower income renters and homeowners access Cohousing - if they have the initiative to follow up. We hope that some of the residents who will move into the Capitol Hill cohousing project will be able to utilize these financial/rental tools. The Cohousing Association of the US is actively working to make these (and other) mechanisms known - helping connect individuals and communities. I'm a Board member of the Association and the chair of the Affordable Cohousing Task Group. We hope to encourage HUD to consider cohousing as an alternative housing model, and to assist communities to incorporate more privately and publicly funded affordable units into their community.
  • Anc
    How about an email addy so those of us interested can contact you?
  • Katlin
    People interested in cohousing and considering Portland should check out Daybreak Cohousing, www.daybreakcohousing.org in north Portland. Members (multigenerational: infants to people in their 70s) started moving into this new community in October and there are openings available. The 30-unit project was designed by Grace Kim of Seattle. They have regular tours and events.
  • LH
    Don't forget Puget Ridge, super cool community of 50 people in 23 units:

    http://www.pugetridge.net/
  • Anc
    I am intrigued by the posibilities of Co-Housing. Theoretically it should allow a person/family to buy above themselves either in bedrooms or location as community space is shared (so no need for a huge kitchen/dining room/living room/etc.) In implementation however, it appears to be developing more along the lines of what John mentioned, yuppies wanting to be edgy and cool and actually paying more for the 'privilege'. :/
  • Jane
    Hi John -- Yes, the concept is not brand new, but there seems to be some new activity in terms of project launches. My sources told me it's very difficult to site these projects and then get community member buy-in so that construction financing targets will be met. I did hear that with so much distressed property on the market (at the apartment/condo building or multiple homes level within different neighborhoods) there's an interesting opportunity for would-be cohousing developers to retrofit existing properties as cohousing communities. If I hear of that happening, will report on it! Cheers, Jane
  • I bought the co-housing book about a decade ago and looked for that style of living since it seemed a natural for Seattle but could not find it for a reasonable price. However, many of the apartment complexes here in Kent and some of the exurbs at least in design appear like a co-housing design (lots of inner courtyards, some isolation from parked cars) than the concrete cubbyhole condos that infected the city during the reign of the egregious Greg Nichols.

    In Sweden, for example, co-housing is an option more for poor people rather than just a bunch of yuppies who want a cool label for their high priced apartment. As far as the communal activities, etc...I'm not really sure if they make a difference. For example, the Old Country Buffet up the street seems to be just as much a Center Table as any that might be built in the complex. And so on.
blog comments powered by Disqus