Morning Fizz, News & Politics

The Democrats on the House Side Bucked Their Senate Cohorts

By Morning Fizz, Thursday, February 18, 2010 at 7:43 AM
View Comments

1. Clearing the way for the legislature to raise taxes, the Democratic-controlled state House voted late yesterday 51-47 to suspend I-960, the voter-approved 2007 Tim Eyman initiative that requires a two-thirds vote to raise taxes. (The Senate suspended the 2007 voter-approved initiative last week).

Two Fizz footnotes on the vote:

A) Not all Democrats (they have a 61-37 advantage in the House) voted for the yay-on-taxes bill. Suburban Vancouver Rep. Deb Wallace (D-17)—who’s running for U.S. Rep. Brian Baird’s open seat in Southwest Washington—voted nay. (She also supported a GOP motion during the debate to postpone the vote.) On the Senate side, Vancouver Sen. Craig Pridemore (D-49), also going for Baird’s seat, voted to suspend 960. Wallace has not returned a call for a comment.

Democratic Rep. Deb Wallace voted with the GOP against suspending I-960

Not surprisingly, GOP Rep. Jaime Herrera (R-18), the Republican state House member who’s running for the Baird spot, voted against suspending  I-960.

Republican Rep. Jaime Herrera

B) The Democrats on the House side bucked their Senate cohorts by keeping one-part of I-960 in tact: A provision requiring public e-mail notices about tax increases proposals, including 10-year-out cost projections.

The Senate Democrats made a big point last week about getting rid of the provisions saying, for example, that 10-year-out budget analysis was unreliable info.

Governor Chris Gregoire released her budget plan yesterday including $500 million in new taxes.

2. There was a public hearing in Olympia yesterday on Seattle state Sen. Ed Murray (D-43) and Spokane Rep. Timm Ormbsy’s (D-3) bill to triple the hazardous substance tax. (The voter-created tax, which is traditionally earmarked for storm water cleanup, hasn’t been raised for over 20 years.)  Advocates for the tax, like Washington Conservation Voters and the Washington Environmental Council, have made the idea attractive to legislators this year by allowing the bulk of the money—the tax will raise about $225 million a year—to go to the general fund. (Over time, the money will once-again be earmarked specifically for storm water clean up.)

Oil industry lobbyist Dave Fisher says the near tripling of the tax would be devastating for the petroleum industry, (responsible for 83 percent of the tax,) as well as the agricultural sect, (due to fertilizer costs,) and motorists during what is already an incredibly lagging economy. “I think it’s important for people to understand that it is not only the petroleum industry that is impacted by the tax,” says Fisher.

Washington Environmental Council’s Policy Director Mo McBroom counters the idea that consumers will be heavily hit by the uptick in prices. Citing Department of Revenue’s data, McBroom claims an analysis of prices showed that an increase in prices due to the tax, “would not be distinguishable from the existing price fluctuations [in the market.]”

She claims the proposal would actually save taxpayers money. McBroom says the state is required to comply with federally mandated water pollution regulations, and if the money does not come from the tax increase on hazardous substances, it will have to come out of the storm water utility tax that all property owners pay. “If we don’t have a solution at the state level, and insure that the polluters are helping to pay for this, we could see up to a  75 percent increase in these taxes that everybody pays,” she says.

3. Legislation that would set limits on campaign contributions in city races made it out of the state Senate this week, beating the cutoff deadline for bills to make it out of their house of origin. The bill, sponsored by Sen. Darlene Fairley (D-32), would limit contributions in city council and mayoral races to $800. Currently, contributions to council and mayoral candidates in Seattle are limited to $700; however, in places like Bellevue, for example, there are no limits on campaign contributions.

In last year’s Bellevue City Council campaigns, victorious candidates Don Davidson, an incumbent, and Kevin Wallace, a newcomer who ousted former council member Patsy Bonincontri, amassed a combined total of $34,500 in contributions  including big checks from the Eastside Business Alliance, the Bellevue Club, the Washington Association of Realtors, and light-rail opponent Kemper Freeman. The Freeman-backed slate is now pushing to move light rail away from downtown Bellevue, where Freeman owns millions of dollars’ worth of property.

4. A majority of the City Council now appears inclined to choose a route for the First Hill streetcar that avoids 12th Avenue and extends north all the way to Aloha down Broadway, assuming Sound Transit can come up with the money, council sources say.

A group of Capitol Hill residents has argued that the streetcar on 12th Ave. would precipitate economic development there; however, others (including PubliCola) have argued that the Sound Transit board voted to place the streetcar on First Hill as compensation for eliminating the neighborhood’s light rail stop; that the 12th ave. route has the lowest ridership of any alternative; that First Hill has much more development potential than 12th Ave.; and that the 12th Ave. alignment would take significantly longer, and require people to walk significantly farther, than any other alignment.

5. The Seattle Human Rights Commission is calling on the city to revisit its contract with Olympic Security, which provides security at City Hall as well as in the downtown transit tunnel, where three Olympic guards stood by while a girl was brutally beaten in January. The guards pointed to a provision in their contract instructing them to refrain from physically intervening in assaults.

In a letter, the city commission noted that the security company’s contract contains a similar provision. “The Commission has a responsibility to ensure that the Mayor, City Council, and the Seattle Police Department are working as hard as they can to make sure this kind of horrific attack never occurs again as uniformed security officers stand by,” commission government affairs director Andrew Lewis said in a statement.

—Erica C. Barnett, Josh Feit, and Teodora Popescu

Today’s Morning Fizz is sponsored by:

  • ratcityreprobate
    I understand the advantages and disadvantages of both proposed streetcar routes. What I don't understand is the routing downtown via the impossibly congested Jackson Street. I can't imagine that anyone would waste their time getting downtown on a streetcar from either First Hill or the Broadway/12th areas when there are numerous buses running east/west. Can someone explain the rational for Jackson Street? Thanks.
  • John
    That's one of the elephants in the room on this whole thing. ST2 promised a streetcar as a replacement for the First Hill station, as mentioned above; unfortunately they phrased it as "a streetcar to connect the light rail stations in the ID and at Broadway". The only sane way to get to the ID is down Jackson. The reality is the streetcar line really doesn't solve the problem it was theoretically intended to solve - to get commuters from light rail to First Hill and thereabouts, serving ST's mission of connecting regional job centers. But it's what we're stuck with.
  • ratcityreprobate
    Well you are correct that Jackson is the only street with a gentle enough incline to work but I can't wait for all those grocers and other shop keepers to find out that they will no longer be allowed to double or triple park delivery trucks on Jackson. That will bring Ruby Chow roaring back out of her grave.
  • Transit Rider
    12th Avenue is crossed by hundreds of buses every day on about 10 different routes.

    It's just nuts to say that 12th Ave. has no bus service!!!!!!!
  • ktstine
    12th has no north/south bus service.
  • Marie
    And it's ridiculous. There's the right of way, there's the space, the population is growing, and yet you cannot get from north to south between Broadway and 23rd Ave. 12th Ave makes a lot of sense.
  • Looking at the issues that have surrounded the ST light rail stops and development being blocked by neighbors, perhaps it's a good idea to not build fixed transit where we want density, but where we have density. We have density on First Hill, the north end of Broadway already has a lot of new density.

    If you build it, density will come has not happened for light rail and is struggling for the S.L.U.T. I'm glad to see our Council recognizes this.
  • johnfsworks
    First Hill has grown quite nicely without a streetcar -- witness the continued building boom by Swedish, V Mason, and Harbor View. Have a look at 12th -- it has languished for decades, yet is centrally located to many neighborhoods. And that is the point. Streetcars are tools for economic development -- long term. You do not spend this sort of money and ask, "what are the numbers now." Instead, you should ponder what could be, and what ought to be. 12th Ave can, and should be a street as vibrant as Broadway (should be). Study the case histories as to how street cars have been central to a neighborhoods re-invigoration. Just look south, say about 170 miles . . .
  • ktstine
    Hey Cola: Thanks for your update on the streetcar...have you examined the numbers that came out last week from SDOT? Projected ridership on the Broadway-12th Couplet is NOT significantly lower and the cost to build this alignment is nearly the same as the Broadway Two-Way alignment, and significantly cheaper AND faster than the Boren alignment that STB has been championing. It remains frustrating that Publicola refuses to acknowledge that 12th south of Union is in the CENTRAL AREA and not Capitol Hill and that the coalition of residents, business owners, institutions and activists calling for an examination of 12th Avenue are all active in the Central Area. Capitol Hill Housing's 12th Avenue Initiative, which calls for transit on 12th Avenue, partners largely with Central Area constituents. This is not a Capitol Hill advocacy effort. While some riders would have to walk longer distances on the Couplet, most would not, especially if your goal is to get to Light Rail, which is the whole purpose of this streetcar in the first place! The Cap Hill Community Council has made a very strong statement that their preference for an extension to Aloha (which we all support) is compatible with any of the southern alignments...
  • Seattle Transit Blog has not been "championing" the Boren alignment. I know, because I write most of the pieces on the streetcar. We support a Two-Way Broadway with dual tracks all the way up to John (or even Aloha).

    People can see the numbers here and make their own conclusions: http://seattletransitblog.com/2010/02/09/city-a...
  • John
    No, John, your comment threads were pushing for Boren. I understand that's not the same thing as your own articles.
  • Cook
    it's slower, costs more than the broadway alignment, has less riders, would be HORRIBLE for any round trip use, worse for bikers, and completely defeats the purpose of the streetcar, which was as a replacement for the first hill stop. there was no 12th ave stop in the original proposals, if i remember correctly.

    i'm still confused as to what exactly are the benefits? i get that the corridor is underserved, so agitate to get a bus line or two over to 12th. or offer some sort of LID to help finance the line and make it cheaper than the broadway-only line. but other than that, there are no discernible gains (to me, at least) from having one leg of the streetcar on 12th.
  • Chris Stefan
    I seem to recall there are also some problems with a water main under the street on 12th too.
  • ktstine
    The lost FH stop was to be at Madison and Summit, with an entrance one block off of Broadway. The 12th Avenue Urban Village ends at Broadway so 12th as a community was as much a part of the promise of a streetcar as FH was. Look at all the early documentation - even the study to choose the streetcar (over a rubber tire solution) did an analysis of how 12th would be served by it! And please look at this data:

    http://www.seattlestreetcar.org/about/docs/alig...

    if you think economic development "defeats the purpose of a streetcar" than why did we build the SLUT? why did PDX build a streetcar through a neighborhood that they intentionally wanted to grow (Pearl District). the truth is that streetcars move people AND make places. to deny this is to ignore the facts of streetcar history and experience.
  • Curious
    What's up with posting a picture of Herrara - and none of the other 3rd CD candidates you mentioned? Much has been made of her "attractiveness" and its potential impact on the race (people are more likely to trust and vote for a candidate they find attractive) - and so your choice of posting a photo of her and only her seems odd.
  • Josh Feit
    I've added Rep. Wallace's photo.
  • Hobgoblin
    Democrats bucking cohorts. Hot stuff.
  • justin
    "that First Hill has much more development potential than 12th Ave."

    What are you guys smoking? If you look at what exists along 12th and what is built on First Hill between Boren and Broadway, I don't know how you could possibly say that.

    12th Ave has empty lots and boarded up businesses. First Hill is multi-story apartments and Hospitals.

    What has more unused development potential?
  • joshuadf
    I think they mean the current zoning is much higher on First Hill.


    By the way, would Sound Transit really pay for the Aloha extension, or would that be city money?
  • zefwagner
    It would have to be city money, but federal grants and/or a LID could help pay for a big chunk of it. The Complete Streetcar Coalition (that's what we're calling ourselves now) is pushing for the City Council and Sound Transit to immediately fund preliminary engineering and environmental review for the extension, which will make it qualify for federal money. Once that is done, we have several years to find the actual construction funds. If you think the extension is important, please let the city council and the mayor know!
blog comments powered by Disqus