The Year's Most Underreported Stories

By Erica C. Barnett, Saturday, December 26, 2009 at 1:30 PM
View Comments

Last week, KUOW’s Ross Reynolds invited me onto his program “The Conversation” to talk about the most underreported stories of 2009. Typically, though, I had a lot more to say than could fit into my three minutes. So here, in slightly longer form, are what I consider the top five most underreported local stories from the past year.

1) The stunning sweep of this year’s Bellevue City Council races by a Kemper Freeman-backed slate of anti-light rail candidates.

PubliCola readers who live in Seattle may not consider three city council races across the water a major local story, but for those interested in the future of light rail, it is: This year, the seven-member Bellevue City Council became dominated by a four-member majority that favors revisiting the voter-approved light rail line through downtown Bellevue, thanks to the election of two new council members, Kevin Wallace and Jennifer Robertson, who were backed by anti-light rail developer Kemper Freeman.

Robertson and Wallace, along with incumbents Don Davidson and C ontrad Lee, support moving the proposed at-grade line through downtown Bellevue either underground (an option Sound Transit estimates would add half a billion to the cost of East Link) or far to the east of downtown along existing rail right-of-way next to I-405 (an option that would almost certainly depress ridership and would no longer serve the south Bellevue park-and-ride.)

The majority contingent has already forced Sound Transit’s hand once, pressuring the agency successfully to study the I-405 alignment, which Wallace has dubbed the “Vision Line.” They could also, as Lee has threatened, hold up Sound Transit’s permits, effectively standing in the way of light rail expansion on the Eastside.

2) The city council races.

Sure, we covered them here on PubliCola plenty, but we were a rare exception to the all-McGinn, all-the-time coverage in the Seattle Times and on other online-only news sites. Of course, we gave McGinn wall-to-wall coverage too–his out-of-nowhere, don’t-underestimate-him campaign was the local story of the year–but by and large, the local council races didnt’ get their due. By the end of this year’s long campaigns, council candidates had taken to complaining openly that McGinn was “taking all the air out of the room.”

And that’s a shame, because this coming year’s council will likely be a stark departure from what longtime city hall watchers are accustomed to seeing. With the addition of civic activist Sally Bagshaw and environmental leader Mike O’Brien–who ran, by the way, on a platform almost identical to, if slightly more pragmatic than, McGinn’s–the class of 2010 will be more professional than ever before. Given the stated mayoral ambitions of both council president Richard Conlin and council powerhouse Tim Burgess, a newly powerful city council might be a factor to give freshman mayor McGinn reason for pause.

3) News from the legislative branch of county government.

The King County Council, similarly, took a backseat to the far flashier King County Executive race, which pitted a longtime county council Democrat who was undeniably qualified for the job against a flashy Republican newscaster who promised to “solve problems and fix things” at a county that “needs fixing.”

Somewhat lost in the shuffle was the frantic (and still ongoing) scramble to replace Dow Constantine, the victor, on the county council. I’ve covered the machinations in detail here, here, here, and here, but suffice it to say that the takeaway is: “Nonpartisan” county government is anything but.

At last count, the county council was split 4-4 along traditional partisan lines, with vague plans to revisit the replacement issue (Republicans want former Seattle City Council member Jan Drago as a placeholder; Democrats want current state Sen. Joe McDermott as a full-time replacement) early this year. An ongoing deadlock on the appointment also spells deadlock on the 4-4 council.

4) The political demise of Tim Eyman and those that brung him.

Obviously, Tim Eyman isn’t going away–the former watch salesman’s entire livelihood depends on bringing in new contributions, and new contributions require new campaigns. But this year’s stunning defeat of his latest tax-slashing measure, Initiative 1033 (his first tax measure, importantly, to be defeated) spells doom for future Eyman initiatives. Voters don’t have to be told that taxes pay for things they need anymore–they can see it all around them, in the state’s crumbling infrastructure, the closure of county parks, and the ongoing budget crisis at the city, state, and county levels.

Moreover–to paraphrase Josh–Eyman’s defeat this year is good news for Democrats in general, suggesting that last summer’s anti-government, anti-Obama backlash was overblown.

5) Mike McGinn as political “outsider.”

Sure, McGinn’s campaign was won largely by the efforts of volunteers, thanks partly to lack of funds and partly to the enthusiasm of dozens of young people who saw his progressive, idealistic campaign as a stark departure from Seattle politics-as-usual.

But as his early decisions (and, indeed, his history in Seattle) make clear, McGinn is no political ingenue. Several of his initial appointments (Marco Lowe, Phil Fujii) have come from within the Nickels/Vulcan political axis, and his green-urbanist group, Great City, was funded in part by Vulcan. Again, we’re not saying that’s a bad thing–however, as we’ve reported repeatedly, those connections may come as a surprise to some of McGinn’s more idealistic supporters.

  • sarah68
    Platypus: I guess you can say that about bus transit also. If a private company was doing it...sure. So anything that isn't obviously a money-maker isn't a good idea.

    Public transportation in Europe isn't expected to be a money-maker; it's not even expected to break even. It's a public service paid for by taxes, because people need it. But then that's Europe, whose countries seem to generally be run by rational thinking, even though the politicians are not rational sometimes.
  • if lightrail was a good idea, a private company would have done it and made millions =)
  • J.R.
    @4: You're right about Kemper. At the big City Club light rail debate with Dow Constantine last year, Constantine kept stating facts and figures and Freeman just sighed and said they were all lies. The most substantial thing Freeman contributed was the story of how he spent two terms in the Legislature in the 1980s and quit because everyone wanted to fund transit when what this state obviously needed was a ton more freeway lanes. His attitude is (and will always be) that we are 30 years behind on building freeways and that every dollar spent on transit is wasted.
  • PrincessPeach
    @ 7. eric

    Ouch. But, I agree with you on publicola's somewhat
    biased agenda. But hey, it is their blog and no
    different than the Seattle Times in reporting.
    Can you believe how high blogs have risen OR have
    low that "traditional" news sources have fallen?
    Take your pick.
    Take everything with a grain of salt.

    No fanboi of Mike O'brien, but I have meet him numerous of times over the campaign trail.
    He is a nice guy AND he is not a chump.
    I am glad that we have some new blood in the
    council. AND, potentially couple more in
    a couple years, if Godden retires and/or
    Bruce doesn't get his shit together.
  • Qum Bay Ya
    oh no.

    not a long and exhaustive process.

    we've never had that before around here.

    and oh no, some one is not playing nice....oh, the trauma......a city sticking up for what it wants...my god that's almost chicago style politics, to have a separate identity and your own wants 'n' stuff.....

    can we withstand the disharmony?

    [shudders....]
  • Michael Marchand
    Despite the Kemper influence on the council, I believe that each member knows that light-rail is not an "if" statement, it is a "when" statement. The bigger issue now is on getting to consensus and moving forward with (a) where the rail should go, and, (b) who will pay for accomodating rail above and beyond the monies available.

    Of concern is the growing perception that Bellevue does not play well with others on the light-rail issue. If council decides they want to go against the grain with Sound Transit, we could be in for a long and exhaustive process before we see the necessity of light-rail become a reality.
  • the amygdalia
    @5

    "it's good public policy" is often a true statement that fails to ever win arguments for reasons stated.
  • eric
    Mike O'Brien is the Sarah Palin of local politics, assisted by Publicola the Fox News of Seattle reporting.
  • Sorry, Ms. Barnett, but LEGAL immigration and the turning of a nation into a business, that could be called America, Inc., by the corporate moguls and the corrupt Congress is the most underreported story. Soon, unless we change our liberal laws, we will be competing with China and India for the most populous country (I almost wrote nation) title; that will probably be around 2050.
  • sarah68
    Yes, but the whole City of Bellevue is affected by it.
  • the amygdalia
    having met with him, he just believes what he believes, and you can show him any number of studies showing rail enhances property values, commerce and his bottom line, the answer here is once again the reptilian brain theory. people do not think rationally, we have much evidence of this, so it's actually irrational to expect people to think rationally. someone who grew up in Bellevue never lived in a city with rail transit someone who developed Bellevue as autoutopia is so unfamiliar with rail and cities you should simply assume he's totally threatened. If you tell him about Amsterdam and Copenhagen....he doesn't know what those places are like. People are like dumb dinosaurs with the brain of a monkey wrapped around the dinosaur brain to provide all kinds of logical rationalizations for the reptilian conclusions.

    (CHANGE = THREAT! THREAT ! THREAT!
    I DID NOT CONTROL THIS OR THINK OF THIS = THREAT! THREAT ! THREAT!)

    Fortunately, the progressive side is never affected by this kind of emotive rationalization........
  • sarah68
    Freeman doesn't want people who take light rail. He wants the BMW/Lexus class.
  • mr. smitty
    Question for Erica or Josh or whoever:

    I can't figure out why Kemper Freeman is so anti-light rail. Does he think everyone who goes to Lincoln/Bell Square will head to Seattle instead? Does he not see the value in easy access for customers from the south-end and other areas to DT Bellevue?

    I've spent enough time in both areas, and think plenty of people would choose Bellevue over Seattle a significant portion of the time. And wouldn't light rail make access to his offerings much easier for a huge customer base?

    Freeman can't just be worried about the loss of parking revenue, can he? Does he doubt his ability to compete with DT Seattle's offerings, even if they're fighting over a much larger pot? Or is this simply a matter of preferring what one already knows, and being the biggest fish in a smaller pond?

    Any knowledge or theories would be really interesting. Thanks.
  • From item 2
    With the addition of civic activist Sally Bagshaw and environmental leader Mike O’Brien


    and from item 5
    those connections may come as a surprise to some of McGinn’s more idealistic supporters.


    As long as media reporting insists on labels found in item 2 you will always have the surprised people in item 5. Doing a story, or 3, while calling these people activists, and such labels, constantly will ensure that the limited stories have a limited impact on who these people are on the whole.

    Obrien is an "Envriromentalist" and He served for 10 years as the chief financial officer at the local law firm of Stokes Lawrence.

    So, he was not bagging your tofurkey at the pcc last year, he was managing the law firms cut.

    Sally Bagshaw just fell out of the sky.
    She might as well have based on your label.
blog comments powered by Disqus