A Pretty Interesting Dialogue

By Morning Fizz, Friday, December 4, 2009 at 7:18 AM
View Comments

fizz

1. King County Executive Dow Constantine will write the county a check for $18,600—the equivalent of ten percent of his salary—to show support for the executive office staffers whose salaries he will cut between 10 and 15 percent to save money during the county’s budget crisis. (By law, county elected officials can’t cut their own salaries; hence, the check.)

Constantine’s total salary for 2010 after that reduction will still represent a significant raise over his previous pay as a King County Council member—around $167,000, or about $46,000 more than he was making on the council.

2. The advisory committee charged with choosing potential replacements for Constantine on the council has come up with four names—two who would seek to run for reelection next November, and two who’ve agreed to serve as “caretakers” until the election.

They are: State Rep. Zack Hudgins (D-11) and state Sen. Joe McDermott (D-34), both of whom would run for reelection; and state Rep. Sharon Nelson (D-34) and retiring Seattle City Council member Jan Drago as potential caretakers.

Details on the machinations and politics behind replacing Constantine here, here, here, and here.

3. People’s Waterfront Coalition founder Cary Moon wrote an op/ed on PubliCola yesterday making an impassioned (and convincing) case for keeping city transportation director Grace Crunican, a Mayor Greg Nickels appointee whom Mayor-Elect Mike McGinn indicated in the past he would fire.

Earlier this week, McGinn wouldn’t tell PubliCola if Crunican was on the way out, citing his policy of not discussing personnel matters with the press. However, we reported on Wednesday that Crunican was in the running the county administrator gig in Clackamas County, Oregon—just outside Portland.

4. The lobbyist for the Transportation Choices Coalition, Bill LaBorde will preview the group’s legislative agenda today at noon in the downtown YMCA (909 4th Ave.) Because it’s a short session focused on filling the $2.6 billion budget hole, one item that likely won’t be on the agenda is the group’s big priority from last year (which failed): The transit-oriented communities bill, which would have increased density around light-rail stops.

5. Speaking of TCC (and the upcoming legislative session), TCC’s Andrew Austin broke the news on the group’s blog yesterday that State Sen. Mary Margaret Haugen (D-10) has declared a tax on vehicle miles traveled “off the table” for funding transportation. Haugen’s comments came up during a discussion about a study commissioned by the state to come up with replacements for declining gas-tax revenues.

TCC blog paraphrased Sen. Haugen saying “that people who scream about VMT taxes are using it as a fear tactic, the legislature is not going to introduce VMT taxes anytime in the near future and it simply is off the table.” Austin added: “It was a pretty interesting dialogue, to say the least.”

According to Austin, “The funding sources that are percolating to the top [this session] are indexed gas taxes [indexed to inflation] and a sales tax on gasoline.

  • Gidge
    @15 I don't think that there's anything unusual when it comes to Kathy Van Olst's departure. She's returning to the prosecutor's office, where she worked before her position with DAJD. She probably hated heading up DAJD and got an intersting assignment with her old office.
  • ivan
    sarah68 @ 19:

    Eyman's credibility took a big hit with the defeat of I-1033, and anyone who doesn't think we need to keep the pressure on him is living in la-la land. His brand of politics and his tactic of government by initiative needs to be smashed as a political force in this state.
  • "We need new leaders" is also kind of silly given we always cycle through new ones, whether in government or in business and activist interests, every 4-8 years. I don't think the lack of new blood is the problem.
  • sarah68
    Eyman's not on the run. He makes his salary whether these things succeed or fail, and he won't stop until his funder doesn't pay him anymore. No sign of that.

    When people say "We need new leaders -- this isn't the 20th century anymore", I'm a little puzzled. What do you want, children running things? Do you just want "new" everything? We're less than 10 years into the 21st century -- there are quite a few experienced 20th century leaders around who aren't codgers yet.
  • Tax all tires as a % of cost like sales tax.

    Smaller and lighter vehicles use smaller, lighter, and cheaper.
    Add a studded tire tax to pay for the damage they do.

    I call it ,Where the rubber meets the road tax
  • ivan
    @ 15, @ 16:

    I do my best to please my legions of fans.
  • Michael M.
    @14 -

    You're not far off from the truth there ;-)
  • Pete
    No fizz on the departures of Directors Kathy Van Olst (Jails) and Theresa Jennings (Natural Resources and Parks) from King County? Both were recent appointees, so, it seems to me, the timing of their departure suggests Constantine has others in mind for those positions.
  • Sometimes when I read his comments, I picture Ivan as a politically astute version of Simpson's grandpa. Grouchy, crotchety, and blustery but capable of gems like, "The Legislature shpould (sic) have the stones to bring back the MVET before it even discusses chickenshit options like VMT and tolling. They should dare Eyman to do something about it, now that we have him on the run."
  • Deb Eddy
    VMT is a concept with several different definitions, phases. A simple measure of VMT is on the odometer. VMT as contemplated in the state's climate change legislation (and as referenced by Sn Haugen, I think) is a multi-variable concept dependent on technology which does not currently exist for mass implementation. The PSRC's Transportation Choices Study a couple of years ago explored the concepts using a couple of hundred local volunteers. I wouldn't make too much of Sen Haugen's comments; in context, the sentiment is pretty widely held.
  • Anna
    Gas needs to be more expensive. I just priced a trip to Vancouver B.C comparing driving including parking to taking the train and it is still half the price to drive.

    As long as it is cheap to drive and highways are considered "free", people will drive.
  • ivan
    I'm with Michael M. @ 6 on this one. The MVET was used for all sorts of transportation, not just highways. It funded mass transit and the ferry system. It was a graduated tax and not a regressive one. It would tax the sale of electric vehicles in addition to petroleum-fueled ones.

    Put a mileage requirement in there and you get a lot of Hummers and Winnebagos off the road. And those odious jet skis? Tax them the hell right out of this state.

    As for a VMT, don't even go there. How many miles anyone drives is none of the state's damn business, and not the business of the enviro nanny-state public scolds who populate these comment threads.

    The Legislature shpould have the stones to bring back the MVET before it even discusses chickenshit options like VMT and tolling. They should dare Eyman to do something about it, now that we have him on the run.
  • notme
    Actually, Andrew should have attended the Tacoma City Council meeting with Senator Haugen last month. She previewed the comment about VMT at that meeting. In response to a direct question about VMT she said she did not Washington to be the first place in the US to implement VMT.
  • Alice Roosevelt
    @8 - Nope
  • Benjamin Leis
    Random question: is Joe McDermott related to Jim McDermott? They even kind of look alike.
  • Alice Roosevelt
    Isn't VMT under consideration in Transportation 2040? http://www.psrc.org/transportation/t2040
  • Michael M.
    Call me old school, but I do miss the MVET. The VMT is extraordinarily regressive, and should never have been on the table in the first place.

    A modified MVET that takes into account mileage and emissions of a vehicle, with a flat fee for vehicles that are of a certain age, would be a nice way to provide for some stability in the tax collections of the state, while simultaneously encouraging people that purchase new cars to purchase greener cars.

    Just my thought.
  • TCC signed a letter last session—along with the Sierra Club, the Cascade Bicycle Club, Futurewise, WashPIRG, the Discovery Institute, and the Bicycle Alliance of Washington— that argued for a paradigm shift on transportation funding.

    The letter (sorry, can't link PDFs in comments, but the letter is in the link above) said Washington state can't and shouldn't rely on the gas tax to fund transportation. The letter highlighted the frustrating irony that gas tax revenues are shrinking because people are driving less and using transit more, yet dwindling gas tax money cannot be spent on transit.
  • Chris Stefan
    @1
    A sales tax on gas can be spent on anything, it isn't restricted like the gas tax.
  • Transpo guy
    We need some transportation leaders who recognize that the future has arrived – we need leaders for the 21st century, not retreads from the 20th.

    Mary Margaret Haugen is the antithesis of that kind of leader. For that matter, so is House chair Judy Clibborn and, at least on transportation, so is Chris Gregoire.
  • SuperSteve
    Terrific - just when our regressive tax structure is hammering the most vulnerable people the worst, Haugen proposes to tighten the screws another turn.

    Do we need more revenue to support alternate transportation?

    Yes - absolutely!

    But we need it from new sources - not simply more revenue from old sources like gasoline taxes.

    We need to account for the fact that people are going to be using less gasoline as they move to more fuel efficient vehicles - including eventually driving electric vehicles that will still clog our roads, but won't pay anything for transportation because they don't use gasoline at all.

    Taking a innovative approach like VMT off the table won't stop people from using it as a scare tactic - scare tactics is what those people are all about!

    We need some transportation leaders who recognize that the future has arrived - we need leaders for the 21st century, not retreads from the 20th.
  • Gidge
    God forbid we find creative ways to fund transportation expenditures. Of course, perhaps the problem is that a VMT tax would have more flexibility in what it could fund.
blog comments powered by Disqus