Meet Your New Sound Transit Board!

By Erica C. Barnett, Monday, October 26, 2009 at 11:27 AM
View Comments

side_crank

As PubliCola noted last week, the King County Executive appoints 10 of the Sound Transit board’s 18 members. The board oversees transit policy in the three-county Sound Transit region.

So who might those board members be if light-rail opponent Susan Hutchison is elected? Hutchison’s spokesman Jordan McCarren did not responded to an email asking that question, but here are some educated guesses.

vibkemperfreemanjr

1) Kemper Freeman. The Bellevue developer and longtime light-rail opponent, who famously appeared in an anti-light rail commercial that called transit a “socialist” program, is a plaintiff in the lawsuit to prevent light rail from coming across I-90. Freeman’s company, Kemper Holdings, gave $25,000 to the King County Leadership Fund (which ran the infamous ads trashing Hutchison’s opponent Dow Constantine) and another $10,000 to the Eastside Business Alliance, which opposes light rail and also contributed to the King County Leadership Fund.

He and his wife Betty have given $1,600 to Hutchison.

skip

2) George “Skip” Rowley. Rowley, an Issaquah developer and major Republican donor, has said he will only give money to candidates who support road expansion, not light rail. Rowley and his company, Rowley Properties, has donated $28,000 to the Eastside Business Alliance.

mccaw-2

3) Bruce McCaw. McCaw, a cell-phone magnate and big financial supporter of Susan Hutchison’s, was a major ($10,000) donor to last year’s anti-light-rail campaign. He and his wife Jolene have given $25,000 to the King County Leadership Fund; his company also owns the luxury house in Laurelhurst where Hutchison has her campaign headquarters.

The McCaws have given $1,600 to Hutchison.

2001994674

4) Martin Selig. Selig, a Seattle real-estate developer, is best known for pouring hundreds of thousands of dollars into the 2004 anti-monorail campaign. He’s given $10,000 to the King County Leadership Fund.

Selig has given $800 to Hutchison.

mikeennis

5) Michael Ennis. Ennis is the Director of the Center for Transportation at the Washington Policy Center, an anti-light-rail right-wing think tank. Although neither Ennis nor the WPC have donated to Hutchison or the groups that are helping her, the ties between Hutchison and the WPC are deep. The organization she heads, the Charles Simonyi Foundation, donated $100,000 to the WPC’s Center for the Environment, which fights environmental regulations and questions global warming. Hutchison has also praised a book by the WPC that she has said “makes you smart”; the book proposing cutting the minimum wage, raising class sizes, and stopping light rail. And she’s been a big supporter of the WPC in other ways, introducing Republicans like former Arkansas Gov. Mike Huckabee and former Florida Gov. Jeb Bush.

2003986480

6) Mark Baerwaldt. Baerwaldt is one of the region’s primary opponents of light rail. Since the early 2000s, he has made fighting light rail his primary political mission—heading up the anti-rail group Sane Transit, fighting at-grade rail in the Rainier Valley, and serving as treasurer for the anti-light-rail No to Prop. 1 campaign last year. He hasn’t given to Hutchison or the groups supporting her, but we think he’d make an invaluable addition to her anti-light-rail light-rail board.

McKenna

7) Rob McKenna. Although the Republican attorney general does not contribute to candidates, he has been a vocal supporter of Hutchison, and has called her refusal to state a party affiliation a “red herring.” A member of the Sound Transit board until 2001, McKenna was one of the region’s staunchest opponents of the light rail system that is now under construction.

rindlaub
8) Sarah Rindlaub. Rindlaub, a Washington Policy Center board member,  is among those suing to stop Sound Transit from moving forward on the Eastside. And as the only woman in the group, she provides a needed dose of diversity to our hypothetical Susan Hutchison slate.

Rindlaub and her husband have given $1,600 to Hutchison.

usmercerpr

9) Jim Horn. The former state senator (R-41) has long fancied himself a leading thinker on transportation. He likes highways, opposes tolls, and thinks Mercer Island, where he lives, would be better served by roads than transit. A longtime opponent of running light rail across I-90, Horn also appears on the list of plaintiffs suing to stop Sound Transit from going to the Eastside.

Bruce Agnew

10) Bruce Agnew. Agnew is head of the Cascadia Center for Regional Development for the Discovery Center, on whose board Hutchison served until late 2007. Agnew has proposed replacing light rail on I-90 with HOV lanes and buses, and has suggested that the Eastside could solve its transportation problems by synchronizing lights and creating public-private partnerships between companies and local governments—no light rail required.

Agnew has given $100 to Hutchison.

And of course, if any of those falls through, there’s always…

mike_huckabee

11) Former Arkansas Gov. and noted transit expert Mike Huckabee! Hutchison gave $500 to Huckabee’s 2008 Presidential campaign.

  • Don't forget that holding a local elected seat is a requirement.

    That said, McKenna's booting from the board, a consistently constructive critic, is perhaps the most substantive dig on Sims and his time at KC.
  • Gordon Monk
    I'll second that on Bruce Agnew. He's devoted many years to innovative thinking and regional cooperation on transportation, including rail, and mass transit of many types.

    He'd be a great person to serve on the board, and his inclusion in the article - along with the ambiguous citation - makes Erica look pretty uninformed.
  • Ross Kane
    Bruce Agnew is a good guy. The Cascade Institute has done great work on bringing electric cars - and the necessary infrastructure - to the I-5 Corridor.

    I live in Snohomish County. I have no vote in the Executive race. But Bruce would actually be a great addition to the Sound Transit Board.

    Ross Kane
    Warm Beach
  • Deb Eddy
    Chris: I answered James over on HA. Unfortunately, the comments by David Dye and Ric Ilgenfritz in the clip are generalities, nothing much there to respond to, IMHO. Thanks for the kind words. NEW TOPIC, for me anyway, is the work PSRC and B'vue have been doing on multi-modal concurrency (actually link transpo and land use). They've not come up with an answer, but they did a darned good job of identifying WHAT WE HAVE TO FIGURE OUT in order to make multimodal concurrency work. We need to be able to articulate exactly what's MISSING when transit isn't serving urban cores. Previously, it was kind of pie-in-the-sky (oh, whatever) ... I'll be happier when we can identify the service hours needed to adequately serve a downtown Redmond, for instance, or the U-district, with more specificity.
  • James
    Deb Eddy @ 30. You should watch the video and check out what David Dye has to say. It only takes a couple minutes.
  • Chris Stefan
    @James
    While I don't always agree with her I find Rep. Deb Eddy to be much more thoughtful about transportation issues than you characterize.

    At a deeper level if one is pro-transit and anti-sprawl it is a good idea to make friends outside the City of Seattle if we want to see better transit and walkable communities actually built.

    The real danger as seen with the current King County Executive race is having suburban areas elect people along the lines of Susan Hutchison or former Sen. Jim Horn.
  • Marge
    That must be a really, really old pic of Sarah Rindlaub.
  • zing
    If you want some real levity, disclosed as such, head on over to the jokester's carnival at Sound Politics, and enter The Dow Constantine Limerick Contest.
  • Deb Eddy
    James @27, 28 ... you are entitled to your opinion, however removed it may be from reality. I have no idea what the "WSDOT honcho" said, nor do I have any interest in "controlling" ST, and when people go off on this sturm und drang dramatic BS, it shows how little you know about the system as a whole.

    I do not "complain" about ST governance. Read a little bit of background in poli sci: make-up of decision-making boards, characteristics, strengths, weaknesses, before weighing in here, James. There are pros and cons to various structures, equitable, financial, etc. Sub-area equity was a devil's bargain which, when added to the executive control of board positions, tends toward a certain way of thinking about and designing the system.

    The state legislature is NOT a better model for decision making. I didn't say that, anyway. YOU DID. :-)
  • Jason
    What an oddly written piece. It is not clear at all that humor was Erica's intent. And how freakin' hard is it to check for typos? The number of grammatical and factual errors in the last couple of months calls into question the entire site's credibility. Every time I read something in the morning I check back at night to see what's been corrected in the original post. Enjoy the site, but it has a ways to go.
  • James
    http://www.seattlechannel.org/videos/video.asp?...

    59:40 mark - ST spokesman sets the issue up

    60:40 minute mark - WSDOT honcho is surprisingly honest in his description as to WHY Deb Eddy is always complaining about ST board governance. The state created ST, but gets frustrated when it can't control ST

    62:00 he hits the nail on the head
  • James
    No, this is NOT a particularly good way to create a decision-making body, I don’t think, but it is the one we’re stuck with.


    And the State Legislature is a better model for decision-making?

    The Governer should appoint all those ST board members? You mean the wishy-washy D Governor who always seems to be out of touch with Puget Sound voters on transportation issues (ie, buses are a great way to justify all our highway building)

    What Deb Eddy wants is somebody to pay for their $5 billion SR 520, and $10 billion 405 build-out. And, since ST supposedly "has all the money," they get to be the whipping boy this decade. It's their fault gas taxes aren't keeping up with inflation. Why should we be building any light rail - afterall, we have a CRISIS, people! There are freeways to build and maintain in the 'burbs!
  • sparkles2.0
    What about that thing Josh said he other day about Publicola being about journalism and not opinion?
  • mike
    Seems like all these people have similar things in common like successful, fiscally responsible, articulate, believe in accountability and are not beholding to all the labor unions. I guess I didn't realize all this was a bad thing.
  • Deb Eddy
    I hesitate to weigh in here, because I could get slimed, having had an occasional thought that didn't pass muster with the more radical elements of the transit bloggers association. THAT SAID, ECB, not a good piece. Levity isn't a bad thing, but not many people even know how a federated board gets put together, what the state statute requires ...

    One of the reasons that many were irritated with Ron Sims for his reversal on the ST proposal a couple of years ago was the fact that HE HAND HAND-PICKED A MAJORITY OF THE BOARD (subject to council approval, of course). No, this is NOT a particularly good way to create a decision-making body, I don't think, but it is the one we're stuck with. (Just in case anyone asks, I'm in favor of a gubernatorially-appointed board; less parochial).

    While I have endorsed and ardently support Dow Constantine in the exec's race, and do believe that many of the Hutchison positions on transit and transportation are a little jejune (2nd time in a month, Fred!) ... well, I wish we wouldn't be so smug in our complete-correctness-and-everyone-else-is-an-idiot. Just to be clear: None of these folks are qualified to serve on the ST board, as a matter of state law.
  • Mikos
    One thing is for sure, group think would be a thing of the past over at Sound Transit. Although I'm not a big fan of light rail, I'm even less a fan of the self-serving Kemper Freemans and Bruce McCaws of the world. And speaking of self-serving, where's Joel Horn?
  • Michael M.
    Today is a frightening day. Ivan enjoyed Erica's..."reporting"...
  • Gary S
    Err, you forgot Repub Billionaire John Stanton, who wants to wipe Sound Transit / light rail from the face of the earth via Regional Transportation Governance "reform."

    Stanton bankrolled the initiative which got Hutchison to where she is now in the polls - the initiative which removed that "R" next to her name on the ballot.
  • 12. With this crowd, you shouldn't be too surprised ;P

    (And yes, I realized the list was a bit tongue in cheek)
  • sarah68
    @16: If you're still undecided between Hutchison and Constantine, nothing will help you.
  • Michael G
    It would have been wise to make it a little clearer that the list was tongue-in-cheek, if that is in fact what was intended. We could also speculate on who Dowser would appoint to the board.
  • Soccer Mom
    Erica:

    Susan's headquarters is in Laurelhurst not Wallingford. Sheesh.

    Fix the McCaw section you're golden.
  • Jen K
    Dumb "article." Hypotheticals do not help me decide who to vote for (not that PubliCola is a place where people go to get objective reporting on both sides of an electoral race).

    Also, re Bruce McCaw, #3 - isn't the luxury house in Laurelhurst, not Wallingford?
  • M
    Never, ever, trust someone nicknamed "Skip." If that's his given name, turn and run away, as fast as you can.
  • ivan
    Another cheap, tawdry, sleazy ECB hit piece, not backed up by a bit of hard information, and typical of ECB's brand of "reporting." I loved every word of it.
  • sarah68
    No levity there. It's thoroughly scary and entirely likely if this...person...gets in.
  • Erica C. Barnett
    Whoa, y'all. No need to take this list so seriously-- just trying to provide a little levity in the last week of the campaign.
  • Erica C. Barnett
    @7: You're right, I didn't include the link to the Hutchison press release. It's there now.
  • There are several factual inaccuracies in this piece:

    1) There are 18 board members on the ST board:
    http://www.soundtransit.org/About-Us/Board-of-D...

    2) Board members are confirmed by the County Council, be elected officials, and meet some other geographic balance criteria.
  • Dan
    Don't Sound Transit board members have to be local elected officials?
  • Jacob
    ECB at it again with amazing journalism. Of course Yellow Journalism worked well once...
  • Andy
    I especially love the part in 7 where you forgot to put in the link for McKenna's vocal support of Hutchison and left in PROVE. Odd to find proofing errors when you make fun of releases for typos...
  • As if
    I think you may have to report this as an in-kind contribution to the Constantine campaign.
  • Elliott
    "I can see Bellevue from my house."
  • AJ
    One glaring problem with your entire list (excepting, of course, Huck at the end), ECB...

    Unless the list is a joke.
  • incredulous
    What impartiality. The "C" isn't for "crank," ladies and gentlemen...
  • rob
    Hutchison's election would be a disaster for transit. (BTW- I though Constantine looked good in last night's televised debate.)
  • Good post
    given the role in ST and Metro, instead of king county executive perhaps we should call it "Chief Transit Officer of the Puget Sound Region"
blog comments powered by Disqus