Gates Foundation Rides to the Rescue: Crosscut Gets $100,000 Gift.

By Sandeep Kaushik, Friday, August 28, 2009 at 6:53 PM
View Comments

Back in March of this year PubliCola reported that people close to Crosscut.com, a bastion of high-minded civic commentary, were saying privately that the site might be on its last legs. Founded by David Brewster, who founded the Seattle Weekly in the 1970s and more recently Town Hall, Crosscut was conceived in 2006 in Brewster’s own image as a haven for "independent, bipartisan, ‘solutionist’ politics" and analysis, as an FAQ provided on the site puts it. The site quickly emerged as a home base for Brewster’s circle of friends and acquaintances in the old school Seattle commentariat, including former Weekly editor and self-described "Mossback" Knute Berger, former Hubert Humphrey aide Ted Van Dyk, and former King Broadcasting CEO Steve Clifford. Former P-I columnist Jean Godden (now on the City Council) has contributed occasionally, as has former WSDOT director Doug MacDonald.

Initially intended as a for-profit venture, the site is privately criticized by some in the local journalism world as overly dry and self-consciously upper-middlebrow to the point of borderline snobbery, though the site’s worship of intellectual detachment and penchant for discursive musings—heavy on context, relatively light on news—has also won it a core of dedicated readers, mostly among the over-50 set.

In any event, Brewster’s solutionist politics turned out to be something of a buzzkill when it came to advertising sales, and the site rapidly burned through several hundred thousand dollars in seed capital drawn from monied Old Seattle benefactors.

By this May the Seattle Weekly (long since sold by Brewster, and currently owned by the nation’s largest alt-weekly chain, Village Voice Media) was also picking up indications of trouble, reporting that Crosscut was having difficulties paying its freelance writers. Brewster, however, was undeterred, hinting at the possibility of better days to come in an e-mail to his contributors. "I’m waiting for a decision on a lead gift that would really launch us, so I hope I can send good news and catch up with past-dues. Thank you very much for staking me and Crosscut," Brewster wrote.

He is waiting no longer. Indeed, happy days are here again for Crosscut; solutionist politics may not have won over many advertisers, but it apparently strokes the intellectual erogenous zones of program officers at major philanthropic foundations. According to two knowledgeable sources, Crosscut, now refashioned as a non-profit venture, is about to receive a $100,000 grant from the Gates Foundation (the Seattle Foundation is also involved) that will ensure the stie’s continued survival for some time to come.

Though the grant is still being finalized, new signs of life at Crosscut are already apparent. As Josh reported a few days ago, Mark Matassa, a talented former Seattle Times , P-I , and Los Angeles Times editor, will be joining Crosscut on September 15 as deputy editor, a half-time position. (Matassa has been a member of PubliCola’s advisory board—not a paid gig—but is now stepping down to take the Crosscut gig; he was not a source for this post).

What other changes the new funding will bring remain to be seen. In response to an inquiry about the new Gates Foundation funding and its implications for the site, Brewster politely declined comment. “I have nothing to announce at this point,” he wrote in an e-mail.

  • Kery Murakami
    I wish we at seattlepostglobe.org got some funding but I agree withsandeep. The more working journalists the better. Matassa truly is one of tyhe great journalists in town and someone I consider a friend. But there's a lot of grteat journalists out there, including many of ex PI folk writing for free on the site we started. We need to support all these efforts including inestigatewest.org. The question has been put to the people of seattle. What type of journalism do you want in this town. If you want the professonal journalism we had please support the efforts that are out there. So far seattle really hasn't, at least not at he levels people in minneapolis and san diego have to support nonprofit journalism. As for feeding the poor.I'm with you but please remember that whether you're concerned about the poor, the environment, city hall, the arts etc..orgabizations rely on coverage to reach the public to promote awareness and their own fundraising. The changes in the media ripple out to every issue as they try to adapt to the question of reaching a broad audience so that you're not simpley preaching to the converted but the vas majoriy who do not read publicola or crosscut or postglobe but yet make up the electorate. I undertstand the comment about gates feeding the homeless but as a former journalist and union leader I hope people realize this is a far bigger issue than a few journalists being out of work
  • I agree with Sarah, and from a similar pov.

    Maybe David Brewster would have more original reporting if he could afford to hire the reporters. I think a change will have less to do with "agreeing" with Sandeep, and more with having the mean$..
    Though I do not know if he would delve into the political ambulance chasing Publicola.

    Turn down the ego knob.
  • Catty, borderline tacky, that is the "charm" of Publicola.
  • Sarah
    No sensitive soul, here. However, I think your response post managed to murk it up even a little further, and showed a bit of cluelessness about who reads what and why.

    I'm not from an upper middlebrow background. I don't have a graduate degree; I not only didn't finish my PhD but didn't finish my 4-year degree. And yet I read Crosscut. I also read Publicola (obviously), and Horses Ass, and the Seattle Times, and The P-I online, and the NYT on-line. The only thing I don't read is FOX News stuff because it nauseates me. I don't care who is on any of these boards because I make my own judgments as to who's been bought and who's not as I read. Probably most readers do.

    Crosscut has very little in it, but what it does have you generally don't find elsewhere (Ted Van D, Brewster, etc.). When it gets completely boring, I'll stop. But so far I haven't noticed being intellectually taxed. Crosscut's stuffy, yes; a bit OCD, also; too complex, no.
  • J.R.
    Sandeep: An extremely snarky and amusing post that even managed to be informative. Ignore the sensitive souls in the comments section and do more of this, not less.
  • Sandeep
    To be clear about a couple of things:

    I do think David Brewster is a talented guy, who has done a lot to add to the civic discourse in Seattle. I come from a pretty upper-middlebrow background myself -- spent a lot of time in graduate school working on a history Ph.D. I never finished -- so I am sympathetic to efforts to elevate (and intellectualize) the discourse. And I like him personally.

    Second, I think the Gates grant is great news. I'm glad to see that Crosscut will survive. We need more media choices in this town, not fewer. Also, there has been a lot of talk in the journalism world about how the old advertising based model is irreparably broken, and great hope has been pinned non-profit public interest journalism filling the void. But aside from a handful of much-hyped examples, I haven't seen much evidence that such a model is viable. So David's success in finding foundation support is notwworthy -- and a feather in his cap.

    The criticisms expressed in the post above is stuff that one hears pretty commonly in local journalism and civic circles about Crosscut. Not to say that those perceptions are anything close to universal -- Crosscut has its share of fans as well. Perhaps not surprisingly, the public radio/public tv crowd appear to be big supporters. Steve Scher, the host of KUOW's "Weekday" comes to mind -- he's even written several pieces for the site.

    And I like Crosscut better than some of its critics do. Brewster's work is often insightful, though I think marred at times by his reliance on the off the record conversations with a relatively narrow range of older Seattle voices. I don't agree with Skip Berger on much -- I don't mourn the loss of some ugly-ass building Ballard that housed a Denny's, so much as I mourn the loss of a Denny's in Ballard -- but I also think he's smart, prolific, informed, full of ideas and a talented writer. Some of the coverage on Crosscut has been excellent; for instance, former Wall Street Journal reporter Bill Richards' reporting on the Seattle Times' finances. Austin Jenkins, the Olympia correspondent for public radio, has contributed some solid work as well.

    But in my estimation there hasn't been enough news content on the site. I do think Crosscut would benefit greatly from more original reporting, and less bloviating from the Friends of David. The hiring of Matassa may be an indication that David agrees.

    One final criticism of Crosscut: the site would benefit from being more transparent about its funders and other benefactors. So far as I know, David has never revealed who sits on his board, for instance. Here at PubliCola we've tried to be transparent about how we operate, where we get our money and how we deal with conflicts. I'm not at all concerned to see that a foundation is funding a media site, so long as that is openly disclosed. Every media site is open to criticism about its revenue sources abd its potential conflicts -- its not like all of the Seattle Times' rules and protestations of ethical rigor protects the paper from widespread public suspicions of the Blethens' influence over the thrust of their news coverage. Now that Crosscut has moved to non-profit status, I think we'll see more transparency -- I suspect David will have more to say about the changes to his site once the Gates grant is finalized.
  • ballardiana
    I think the greater concern is the Gates Foundation funding ANY media outlets. This grant guarantees that Crosscut will avoid any investigative-type reporting on the foundation, from its international agriculture ventures in Africa, to its land-use practices in Seattle. There's now one less possibility for informing us all on what the Gates Foundation really does, and the effect it has on all of us.
  • summer girl
    @Sarah: Thanks for your comment. And I hope you didn't read my remarks as aimed at you. I actually thought your pull out of the 'upper middlebrow' reference was on point and very funny.

    For my part I have not read Sandeep's posts about Crosscut as derisive or overly critical. Crosscut takes its hard shots at many in the public domain. I just thought it was a little thin skinned for its supporters to respond with personal (and fairly ugly) attacks.

    But as you point out there are many, many other things in our community that are of greater importance than which blog is up or down this week.
  • Sarah
    It's not supporting Crosscut. There are better things to support than what's essentially a blog. What's a shame is any blog (or however the thing would be characterized) deriding another blog (or however, etc.) for its supposed readership, and then further deriding that readership. Snobbery's not attractive, no matter who's practicing it.

    The bigger shame in this is that Gates didn't give that money to one of the many organizations that would use it to feed and shelter people who might be in worse case than a few journalists.
  • summer girl
    Apparently Sandeep has struck a nerve. The supporters of Crosscut dost protest too much.
  • I wish the Gates Foundation was interested in supporting bolder online ventures than Mr. Brewster's journal of barely boomer thought.
  • Trevor
    They could try to boost readership by posting unverified rumors, thereby forcing the powers that be to mobilize their bases to check in regularly and do aggressive damage control and sock puppetry.
  • Sarah
    "Borderline snobbery"? How about "self-consciously upper-middlebrow" and "mostly among the over-50 set" for snobbery, and not borderline, either.
  • Sandeep, find a rock
    Oh, so Matassa is a "talented" former journalist but Brewster is less?

    Sandeep, you are Seattle's hack for hire.

    Brewster is one of Seattle's great journalists and you are not. Gloating over Crosscut's financial challenges at a time when pretty much every journalism publication is struggling is a pretty cheap shot. And coming from you, a skank who sleeps in every alley in town is pretty pathetic. But hey, thanks for telling us that Matassa wasn't your source. What a relief.
  • Good for them, deep thoughts have a place to go, and Chris Vance too.

    Ha! Ha!

    For more hair splitting than one should normally subject themselves too, and having no natural home, I do enjoy the intent of the writers, even Ted Van Dyk.

    There have been many good reads there, Mr. Brewster has been kind enough to respond to a few of my inquiries.
blog comments powered by Disqus