Irony in Oly

By Josh Feit, Wednesday, March 25, 2009 at 2:28 PM
View Comments

As the clairvoyant Morning Fizz told you this morning, the state Senate transportation budget—just unveiled at a press conference by Senate transportation chair Sen. Mary Maragaret Haugen (D-10, Camano, La Conner) this afternoon—does not include previously promised-funding ($30 million) to prep I-90 for light rail, i.e., HOV lanes. 

Here’s the deafening irony from today’s press conference: Sen. Haugen repeatedly reminded reporters that the slashed transportation budget—a $514 million shortfall in this biennium—was unavoidable because transportation projects rely on the gas tax, and, given that  there’s a recession on and gas prices are so high—people are driving less; i.e., they’re using public transit. So, there’s less gas tax revenue.

Her transportation committee’s response: Cut transit funding. 

During the Q&A, Seattle Times transportation reporter Mike Lindblom, pointed out another frustrating thing about the cut: Voters, those people who are driving less, overwhelmingly approved Sound Transit expansion across I-90 just last November.

Sen. Fred Jarrett (D-41, Mercer Island, Bellevue) fielded Linblom’s “question” saying he “took issue with the idea that the legislature was backing away from its commitment.”  

He explained: “It’s in the budget. It’s just outside the parameters of this budget.”  

Jarrett was referring to the fact that 31 projects, including the I-90 HOV Improvement, were identified in the budget as “delayed pending additional, future transportation revenue.”

  • Gary
    Is anyone home in Seattle City Hall? Sure, Greg Nickels isn't a legislator, but he isn't a very effective advocate for Seattle's interests either. Instead of agreeing that $2 billion in gas-tax money should be spent on a 1.7-mile-long tunnel on the waterfront, Nickels should be talking with legislators about how to use the money to preserve HOV and other projects that would benefit transit. McGinn for Mayor, please.
  • eddiew
    simple solution: use ST2 funds to pay for WSDOT share of third phase of R8A and have WSDOT pay them back later; implement R8A quickly.
  • EvergreenRailfan
    Is there anyway to reach out to Eastern Washington legislators, like offer more help fixing up the Palouse River and Coulee City. It needs track upgrades that the current operator is unable to pay, and I doubt other short-line operators would, because in some cases, like RailAmerica, they are owned by hedge funds. It does it's best at 10-20MPH, but if they can get it up to speeds competitive with trucks, they can move much more grain to the BNSF main. The company claims they did not have enough money, because locomotive fuel costs went up. The photos of the EWGRR in TRAINS Magazine showed they were using older units, I think SD40s or GP40s. A few GenSets would help, maybe some of the non-Gensets Progress Rail and MPI are building. If the line was properly upgraded, they would be taking trucks off the road, not staving off adding more. It's a catch 22. The more fuel-saving locos might not be able to handle the current track, but the railroad is being drained of cash that could be used to fix up the track by higher fuel costs.

    http://www.seattlepi.com/local/6420ap_wa_railro...
  • kt:

    No, this isn't a sales tax project. This isn't a Sound Transit project. It's the project that the state legislature decided to make into a requirement before Sound Transit could build East Link.

    This isn't part of light rail, but the state isn't willing to hand over the express lanes until these HOV lanes are built.
  • kt
    Hold on I VOTED for my sales taxes to go to ST II. Period End of Story. Are they taking that money away?
  • As we reported, the state actually starting pushing back funding in early 2007, before there were any budget problems at all.

    So I'm not sure it's just about budget problems.
blog comments powered by Disqus